Most of the time, I really love living in the South-- well, at least this part of the South. But every once in a while I see something that just sets my rage a-flaming. You know, like this:
So I go to pick up my prescriptions this afternoon, and this is what I run into-- a freaking drugstore serving forties and ping pong balls together in the same cooler. It wasn't like it was just the one spot, either-- every other door had a hanging display of em'. Nothing says encouraging responsible alcohol use on my party campus and the high school three blocks down the street quite like one-stop shopping for all your beer pong needs.
You can't blame this on just this CVS, however. The drugstore three blocks down the road is a Wallgreen's, and they do the same thing. Ladies and gentlemen, I don't want to say that this is the reason for the alcohol abuse culture I see with my students... but it sure ain't helping.
Calling all Theater companies and performers!
Open Call to Theater companies, performers, researchers:
I would like to hear other voices besides my own on this blog. If you'd like to write about your TLP experiences here, e-mail them to me and I'll put them up.
Topics can include dramaturgy to staging to personal responses to the play. Anything goes!
I would like to hear other voices besides my own on this blog. If you'd like to write about your TLP experiences here, e-mail them to me and I'll put them up.
Topics can include dramaturgy to staging to personal responses to the play. Anything goes!
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Monday, December 13, 2010
Links: Morning Has Broken- Una Vita Spezzata
Well, it seems as if my Flickr ticker on the blog has yielded another loose Laramie narrative running free, this time in Italy. The photo you see here (and which showed up on my blog a couple weeks ago) is from a concept performance called Moring Has Broken- Una Vita Spezzata, which debuted in Firenze, Italy back in November around the same time that we were having Thanksgiving back stateside. The performing company described it as a "reportage" moments and excerpts from both The Laramie Project and Judy Shepard's book The Meaning of Matthew.
As you can see from the photo at left, the staging is extremely minimalistic, it focuses on the abstract, and... well, it's in Italian. (If my Latin doesn't fail me, that sign says "The shining lights of Laramie.) Unfortunately, I can't find any information about the content or staging of the performance, so I can't really speculate about the content. I'm fairly intrigued, however, by the idea. By calling this a "reportage" they claim to be relaying news in an abstract sense, but their main texts are a memoir and a play. So, if anything, it's a reportage of first-hand accounts, creatively rethought. I wish I could find a little video clip of this, but there's nothing up on that, either.
There are, however, some nice stills of the performance if you want to get a sense of it. You can view most of the set on a Flickr Photostream here, including a poster for the event, but if you're the sort that prefers your Internet searching to have a soundtrack, someone involved with the production set them up as a slide show with some old school Cat Stevens as a YouTube video.
And, there is contact information via a Facebook event if you'd like more information here (and have better Italian skills than I do.)
Labels:
links,
Matt Shepard,
theater
Friday, December 10, 2010
The Airing of Grievances, Charge 1
As it turns out, my brother Coyote, who still lives in Laramie, also has an angsty relationship with The Laramie Project. I had already sort of known this, of course; both he and my sister were living in Laramie back in 1998, too, and back in my "I hate this freaking play" phase in the Deep South, he and I had a few conversations about that.
But until this summer, I thought that his complaints just stemmed from his own personal knowledge of the incident. Coyote, you see, knew both of the killers and Matt Shepard through various channels even though he didn't have any kind of deep relationship with any of them. He was much better friends with "Sascha" and several other members of the LGBTA on campus. And, since our conversations had mostly revolved around that social set, I had always thought that his main gripe against the play was just the "accuracy" issue.
As it turns out, though, I was wrong; his dislike was more complicated than I had given him credit for. Over dinner one night at a fancy bar and grill (where I was buying him his obligatory steak dinner), Coyote told me that he had watched the HBO version of the play and had some extremely pointed comments about its message. He said he didn't like what the HBO version had to say about what Laramie was like as a community, and he didn't think that the message had any balance. He was also surprised that I didn't completely disagree with him. "On the whole, though, don't you think this play has done some good nationwide?" I asked him. "I mean, people are actually willing to talk about issues like this now..."
And so, I hereby must proceed to the airing of my first grievance in this Festivus season:
Or, I could call it "Transporting an Underage Story Across State Lines," I suppose. The point is this: in disseminating this story, Tectonic has left many in Laramie feeling like they have no control over their own identities, leaving some people to feel vulnerable or exposed, a point I've discussed before. That may not necessarily be a bad thing, but let's work out the details to see where it leads...
But until this summer, I thought that his complaints just stemmed from his own personal knowledge of the incident. Coyote, you see, knew both of the killers and Matt Shepard through various channels even though he didn't have any kind of deep relationship with any of them. He was much better friends with "Sascha" and several other members of the LGBTA on campus. And, since our conversations had mostly revolved around that social set, I had always thought that his main gripe against the play was just the "accuracy" issue.
As it turns out, though, I was wrong; his dislike was more complicated than I had given him credit for. Over dinner one night at a fancy bar and grill (where I was buying him his obligatory steak dinner), Coyote told me that he had watched the HBO version of the play and had some extremely pointed comments about its message. He said he didn't like what the HBO version had to say about what Laramie was like as a community, and he didn't think that the message had any balance. He was also surprised that I didn't completely disagree with him. "On the whole, though, don't you think this play has done some good nationwide?" I asked him. "I mean, people are actually willing to talk about issues like this now..."
"Well, sure, yeah," Coyote said. "I can totally see where this play has done a lot of good. But, come on, Jackrabbit-- why did we have to be the ones to pay for it?"
"So, you mean you feel like telling Laramie's story comes at a cost?" I asked him.
"Hell yeah," He answered through a mouthful of steak. "This sort of thing happens all over the country, but I don't see any of them having to relive this story every time somebody puts on a play." He waved his fork at me for emphasis. "We can't escape it. We can't even answer back to it. How fair is that?"I couldn't keep my jaw off of the floor when he said that. I had sort of been wondering the same thing for months: does the simple fact of telling Matt's story in the context of this community cause social damage? Like Coyote, I know the kind of social good this play has engendered on the macro scale; but I also wonder, like him, what kind of unintended cost the microcosm of Laramie has had to absorb as a result.
And so, I hereby must proceed to the airing of my first grievance in this Festivus season:
1.Contributing to the Delinquency of Narrative
Or, I could call it "Transporting an Underage Story Across State Lines," I suppose. The point is this: in disseminating this story, Tectonic has left many in Laramie feeling like they have no control over their own identities, leaving some people to feel vulnerable or exposed, a point I've discussed before. That may not necessarily be a bad thing, but let's work out the details to see where it leads...
Labels:
ambivalence,
community,
identity,
memory,
narrative,
The Grievances,
The Laramie Project
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Laramie in Pictures: Vedauwoo and Ames Monument
Where have all the railroads gone? asks the Ames monument... |
Vedauwoo is one of my favorite places because of its strange geologic architecture. The bright pink granite that makes up most of the range between Cheyenne and Laramie is stacked up in these massive, huge boulders which attract rock climbers from all over the nation. It's a popular camping, recreation, and picnic spot for the UW students. In the dusk, the landscape looks almost mystical.
Ames Monument is a stranger, more enigmatic spot. A three minutes' ride down a rose-colored gravel road and through a horse pasture will lead you to a massive pyramid built out in the middle of nowhere, a monument to the wealth and influence of the Union Pacific Railroad financiers Oakes and Oliver Ames (two brothers, and rather shady figures.) Oakes was eventually censured by Congress for fraud and died in disgrace.
The monument to Oakes and Oliver Ames was built to mark the highest point of the UP transcontinental railroad lines, which were then promptly moved elsewhere; the monument therefore now stands alone, marking the point of an amazing accomplishment now tarnished by corruption and diminished by the Interstate system. For decades it has sat undisturbed near an abandoned town, but there are signs of development nearby now-- a possible high-end subdivision, it looks like. (blech.) It seems like no patch of land is safe from breaking out in residential, picket-fenced pimples anymore.
Anyhow, here are a few pictures I took (and a couple I didn't) of these two strange, mythical spots on the edge of the Laramie landscape!
The weather erodes the pink Sherman granite into the most strange shapes, as seen here.
I wanted to show you the larger stuff, but I didn't have time to venture far into the park. So, here are two pictures from Flickr to give you the feel:
Photo by Coulter Sunderman, via Flickr. I'm jealous... |
This one's also by Coulter Sunderman, from Flickr. This might be my favorite photo I've seen. |
As with a lot of public lands, the areas outside Vedauwoo are often rented for pasture. Here's a trio of Angus bullocks who came to check me out as I drove to the entrance...
And here are two views of the Ames monument for you:
This one comes from Lord the air smells good today's Flickr photostream. (I just love that name.) |
I'd like to give a special shout out to both Coulter Sunderman and Lord the Air Smells Good Today for sharing their photos via Creative Commons. Thanks!
Labels:
In Pictures,
landscape,
Laramie,
Vedauwoo
Monday, December 6, 2010
Oh, Manhattan Declaration, you unruly thing...
Good grief, Steve Jobs, do not make me have to stick up for the freaking Manhattan Declaration...
Okay, so CNN's Belief blog is reporting that Apple had removed the Manhattan Declaration's app for iPhone from their app store, citing complaints about the offensiveness of the content. (Well, gee, I never would have seen that one coming.) The main issue, it seems, is a quiz you can have your friends take to show your Manhattan awesomeness or something by asking if you're against gay marriage and whatnot.
Supporters of the Manhattan Declaration, naturally, are pitching a fit. Oh, and they've also started a petition, as it turns out. Right now it's only got about 40,000 signers, so it might go somewhere.
Maybe.
Okay, so on a serious note, I really don't like this due to the issues of free religious speech surrounding it. Sure, I don't care for the Manhattan declaration one bit. (you can see me rant about it even more here and here.) But this is dealing with speech specifically protected by the Constitution. Besides, the App store has tons of religious apps, from a compass that will help me determine the direction of Mecca to Ba'hai commentaries to a complete Catholic liturgy I can run on my iPod (I almost bought that, actually.) Some of the apps I see in this category I find just as annoying as the Manhattan Declaration. So, why single out an app that's specifically designed to be a free declaration of a person's beliefs about their faith and its intersections with culture? (Well, it's a squeaky wheel issue, of course. That's a rhetorical question I guess.)
Apple Inc. has never really shown itself to be a huge proponent of free speech-- rather, they are usually more proponents of huge profits, and in order to do that, they tend not to stir the muck. Sure, I didn't complain too much when they discontinued the "Wobble" app and limited other sexually explicit content. But then again, there wasn't such a clear component of protected speech about that one, either. Apple reserves the right to oust content they determine to be "widely offensive," but, come on-- stating one's moral opposition is not inherently offensive. And I'm even saying that as a strong opponent of the MD who has read the thing.
And so, I find myself in a strange position now. I'm all for free speech. I'm especially for free religious expression, whether I like what others have to say or not. On the one hand, Apple is a private corporation and they have the right to police content. On the other hand, they are the only way to get apps onto an iPhone. Their decision to discontinue, then, really moves into the realm of digital censorship at that point, and in my mind, that's where things get sticky.
So, based on my personal beliefs... do I really have to stick up for the Manhattan Declaration??!? Blech. I'd feel like such a hypocrite...
Okay, so CNN's Belief blog is reporting that Apple had removed the Manhattan Declaration's app for iPhone from their app store, citing complaints about the offensiveness of the content. (Well, gee, I never would have seen that one coming.) The main issue, it seems, is a quiz you can have your friends take to show your Manhattan awesomeness or something by asking if you're against gay marriage and whatnot.
Supporters of the Manhattan Declaration, naturally, are pitching a fit. Oh, and they've also started a petition, as it turns out. Right now it's only got about 40,000 signers, so it might go somewhere.
Maybe.
Okay, so on a serious note, I really don't like this due to the issues of free religious speech surrounding it. Sure, I don't care for the Manhattan declaration one bit. (you can see me rant about it even more here and here.) But this is dealing with speech specifically protected by the Constitution. Besides, the App store has tons of religious apps, from a compass that will help me determine the direction of Mecca to Ba'hai commentaries to a complete Catholic liturgy I can run on my iPod (I almost bought that, actually.) Some of the apps I see in this category I find just as annoying as the Manhattan Declaration. So, why single out an app that's specifically designed to be a free declaration of a person's beliefs about their faith and its intersections with culture? (Well, it's a squeaky wheel issue, of course. That's a rhetorical question I guess.)
Apple Inc. has never really shown itself to be a huge proponent of free speech-- rather, they are usually more proponents of huge profits, and in order to do that, they tend not to stir the muck. Sure, I didn't complain too much when they discontinued the "Wobble" app and limited other sexually explicit content. But then again, there wasn't such a clear component of protected speech about that one, either. Apple reserves the right to oust content they determine to be "widely offensive," but, come on-- stating one's moral opposition is not inherently offensive. And I'm even saying that as a strong opponent of the MD who has read the thing.
And so, I find myself in a strange position now. I'm all for free speech. I'm especially for free religious expression, whether I like what others have to say or not. On the one hand, Apple is a private corporation and they have the right to police content. On the other hand, they are the only way to get apps onto an iPhone. Their decision to discontinue, then, really moves into the realm of digital censorship at that point, and in my mind, that's where things get sticky.
So, based on my personal beliefs... do I really have to stick up for the Manhattan Declaration??!? Blech. I'd feel like such a hypocrite...
Labels:
ethics,
faith,
GLBT,
links,
Manhattan Declaration
Friday, December 3, 2010
The Airing of Grievances
Ah, Festivus.
To be honest, my family was acquainted with its own version of that holiday long before Seinfeld ran with it on their sitcom, but in my family we called it by traditional names like "Thanksgiving" or "Christmas." In my family, holidays have never been a source of joy and conviviality, but rather, something much more closely akin to what George Costanza's father had in mind, with feats of strength and the all-important airing of grievances.
The Jackrabbit family has always rigorously observed the Airing of Grievances at holiday gatherings and (for some reason peculiar to us) especially Thanksgiving. There's something about the tryptophan in turkey and the close proximity to each other that makes my relatives feel like it's a good time to explain to each other exactly how we're screwing up each others' lives. This has always made for a lively Thanksgiving: food, festivity, and, after a few beers and a bottle or two of wine, fireworks.
At this point, The Laramie Project feels like family, too, but more in that Married with Children sense of "family" than The Waltons, which is fine with me; my real family is more like Married with Children anyhow. My relationship to the play is a little dysfunctional, a little codependent, and definitely just a tad hostile; conversely, if anybody else bashes them, I get righteously pissed. In my family, that means you love each other, so... I guess that means I love Tectonic Theater. Welcome to the family, guys. Pull up a chair and pass the gravy.
After blogging on The Laramie Project for so many months now, I feel like I'm finally able to tease out some of the knotty spots regarding my relationship to this play. I can now say truthfully (and with much relief) that I don't hate this play or Tectonic Theater. I can also say that my ambivalence for the play has stemmed from a lot of issues, not because Tectonic Theater did something wrong, but usually because they did so many things right. The play makes me angsty and hostile because it seriously challenges my identity in ways I don't always think are fair, but are nevertheless important for social growth. In some ways, my relationship is a lot like a hostile teenager to a confrontational mentor: I'll grow up and develop into an ethical citizen working for a just society because of you, but I'm still going to resent it. So there. Nyah.
I've been spending a lot of time talking about the social good that this play can do, like in my one-and-only academic conference paper on The Laramie Project. And, except for couple notable exceptions, every time that I think that I've had a genuine complaint against what Tectonic Theater had done, I eventually realize that I haven't considered things completely and that I don't really have a complaint after all. Up to this point, I could point to complications, but not genuine problems once I understood the nuance of the situation, so all I had left was sunshine and rainbows.
Well, I suppose until now, that is. There are a few nagging questions I've had running around in my head for at least five months, and I think it's about time I address them now. I've long since raised my blogosphere Festivus pole. It's time, now that I've had my Feats of Strength sparring with this play and gotten this dysfunctional family around the proverbial dinner table, that we must finally have the Airing of Grievances.
In a way, I feel like coming to this point represents a genuine breakthrough with my relationship with The Laramie Project because I can appreciate it for both its strengths and weaknesses without feeling that they define who I am, too. I can also approach it with some critical distance while appreciating all the good they've done.
The play has created amazing moments of social reform because of its unpredictable power-- but that unrestrained power has caused a lot of damage, too. It's like getting radiation therapy: Tectonic Theater identified a terrible social cancer and started attacking it, but they also damaged the surrounding tissues in the process, agitated the body as a whole. And in a real sense, you have to take the bad with the good; you can't stop showing The Laramie Project because of the unpredictable consequences. Yet, you still have to recognize that those problems are there, and that their effects are very real. I feel we need to have an airing of grievances so that we can realize what is truly at stake with social theater as radical and powerful as The Laramie Project. If you're trying to be an earthquake like Tectonic Theater and you shake things up... well, you have to take responsibility for the cracks in the foundations afterward, for the broken earth and shattered windows.
So that's my plan with my next several posts: I am going to be extremely honest about individual areas where I feel like Tectonic has caused a little unintentional social damage or maybe misunderstood their role in the process of bringing Laramie's story into the spotlight. Some of these grievances will be fair, and maybe others won't. Mostly, I want to be extremely honest about what the consequences of those problems might be-- not so that I can judge the play for the damage, but so that we can have a fuller idea of the power and potential of social theater to enact change, be it life-changing in a positive or a catastrophic way.
So: Let the Airing of Grievances begin!
PHOTO CREDIT:
1) A Festivus card, from "teh Internets." I've seen this in a lot of places and don't know who to attribute. If it's yours, feel free to let me know and I'll attribute you!
2) Earthquake damage in Seattle, 1949, from the Seattle Municipal Archives on Flickr. Available under a Creative Commons License.
To be honest, my family was acquainted with its own version of that holiday long before Seinfeld ran with it on their sitcom, but in my family we called it by traditional names like "Thanksgiving" or "Christmas." In my family, holidays have never been a source of joy and conviviality, but rather, something much more closely akin to what George Costanza's father had in mind, with feats of strength and the all-important airing of grievances.
The Jackrabbit family has always rigorously observed the Airing of Grievances at holiday gatherings and (for some reason peculiar to us) especially Thanksgiving. There's something about the tryptophan in turkey and the close proximity to each other that makes my relatives feel like it's a good time to explain to each other exactly how we're screwing up each others' lives. This has always made for a lively Thanksgiving: food, festivity, and, after a few beers and a bottle or two of wine, fireworks.
At this point, The Laramie Project feels like family, too, but more in that Married with Children sense of "family" than The Waltons, which is fine with me; my real family is more like Married with Children anyhow. My relationship to the play is a little dysfunctional, a little codependent, and definitely just a tad hostile; conversely, if anybody else bashes them, I get righteously pissed. In my family, that means you love each other, so... I guess that means I love Tectonic Theater. Welcome to the family, guys. Pull up a chair and pass the gravy.
After blogging on The Laramie Project for so many months now, I feel like I'm finally able to tease out some of the knotty spots regarding my relationship to this play. I can now say truthfully (and with much relief) that I don't hate this play or Tectonic Theater. I can also say that my ambivalence for the play has stemmed from a lot of issues, not because Tectonic Theater did something wrong, but usually because they did so many things right. The play makes me angsty and hostile because it seriously challenges my identity in ways I don't always think are fair, but are nevertheless important for social growth. In some ways, my relationship is a lot like a hostile teenager to a confrontational mentor: I'll grow up and develop into an ethical citizen working for a just society because of you, but I'm still going to resent it. So there. Nyah.
I've been spending a lot of time talking about the social good that this play can do, like in my one-and-only academic conference paper on The Laramie Project. And, except for couple notable exceptions, every time that I think that I've had a genuine complaint against what Tectonic Theater had done, I eventually realize that I haven't considered things completely and that I don't really have a complaint after all. Up to this point, I could point to complications, but not genuine problems once I understood the nuance of the situation, so all I had left was sunshine and rainbows.
Well, I suppose until now, that is. There are a few nagging questions I've had running around in my head for at least five months, and I think it's about time I address them now. I've long since raised my blogosphere Festivus pole. It's time, now that I've had my Feats of Strength sparring with this play and gotten this dysfunctional family around the proverbial dinner table, that we must finally have the Airing of Grievances.
In a way, I feel like coming to this point represents a genuine breakthrough with my relationship with The Laramie Project because I can appreciate it for both its strengths and weaknesses without feeling that they define who I am, too. I can also approach it with some critical distance while appreciating all the good they've done.
The play has created amazing moments of social reform because of its unpredictable power-- but that unrestrained power has caused a lot of damage, too. It's like getting radiation therapy: Tectonic Theater identified a terrible social cancer and started attacking it, but they also damaged the surrounding tissues in the process, agitated the body as a whole. And in a real sense, you have to take the bad with the good; you can't stop showing The Laramie Project because of the unpredictable consequences. Yet, you still have to recognize that those problems are there, and that their effects are very real. I feel we need to have an airing of grievances so that we can realize what is truly at stake with social theater as radical and powerful as The Laramie Project. If you're trying to be an earthquake like Tectonic Theater and you shake things up... well, you have to take responsibility for the cracks in the foundations afterward, for the broken earth and shattered windows.
So that's my plan with my next several posts: I am going to be extremely honest about individual areas where I feel like Tectonic has caused a little unintentional social damage or maybe misunderstood their role in the process of bringing Laramie's story into the spotlight. Some of these grievances will be fair, and maybe others won't. Mostly, I want to be extremely honest about what the consequences of those problems might be-- not so that I can judge the play for the damage, but so that we can have a fuller idea of the power and potential of social theater to enact change, be it life-changing in a positive or a catastrophic way.
So: Let the Airing of Grievances begin!
PHOTO CREDIT:
1) A Festivus card, from "teh Internets." I've seen this in a lot of places and don't know who to attribute. If it's yours, feel free to let me know and I'll attribute you!
2) Earthquake damage in Seattle, 1949, from the Seattle Municipal Archives on Flickr. Available under a Creative Commons License.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Some Short Creative Nonfiction from RBU
In Appalachia's blank winter skies and endless rain at the end of this November, I find myself longing for stars and family. This is a piece I wrote for Real Bloggers United some months ago and find myself revisiting, so I thought I'd share it.
Starlight Requiem
God is an intelligible Sphere whose centre is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere.
PHOTO CREDIT:
1) Night Sky (Wish you were here Andreas) by Indian.summer 1901's Flickr photostream:
Starlight Requiem
God is an intelligible Sphere whose centre is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere.
-- Alan of Lille
* * *
This is my Father's world,
And to my listening ears,
All nature sings, and round me rings
the music of the Spheres...
“What’s wrong?” My then-boyfriend asked me when I stopped singing. I turned to face him with a frown.
“The ‘music of the spheres?’” I said over the noise of the worship service. “That’s so anachronistic. It’s an image from a geocentric universe.”
“But it’s really just a metaphor,” he offered helpfully. I shook my head.
“But that’s exactly the kind of thing that gets me funny looks at college when I tell people I’m a Christian now,” I protested. Some of the other parishioners started eyeing me doubtfully, so I shrugged it off and joined in at the refrain.
Back when I was twenty years old, I could have sworn things like that mattered. I grew up in Montana as the youngest child of amateur geologists who worshiped a faceless but benevolent God in the vast church of Nature, and the dome of that supposed crystalline sphere formed our cathedral. My mother’s God, the grand scientist driving Nature, wasn’t exactly an absent watchmaker—but He was punctual and a little distant, and He was careful to keep that watch brightly polished and wound tight. As a neophyte Christian with one foot still planted inside that starry cathedral, I was reluctant to denigrate Him, or so I thought, with such an outmoded view of the universe. The stars were most definitely not fused into some crystalline globe, I adamantly declared, and no music filled the skies with a sympathetic ring from their revolution—and it secretly embarrassed me to hear such a thing proclaimed in the church I attended, seemingly to confirm all the stereotypes my old friends held about my new faith.
And yet, when I was a child living in a house of science, my childhood cathedral was dominated by the turning of the spheres and I never knew it. You see, star watching guides don’t talk about the motion of the earth around the sun—they talk about the night sky and sun revolving eternally around the horizon line, with Polaris its hub and the constellations churning about in their various declinations. The stock-still earth served as my kneeling-bench as I gazed up, up, into the rood-loft of the night and learned the names of the stars in the Northern Cross in almost the same way that a medieval priest might have taught his flock the names of the Patriarchs whose lives were painted on the walls. In my head, I knew that the earth turned around the sun; but in the deep recesses of my imagination, God’s stars and His sun turned inexorably around the earth.
Now that I am several years further down the road in my stargazing (and in my Christian faith), I’ve come to realize that I needed both views of the stars in order to help me cope with the vastness of a world I don’t always understand. For one, I was surprised to discover that my smug dismissal of the geocentric world is really a side-effect of my recent urbanization. When I looked up into the Chicago sky some years ago, my earth spun off its axis, zipping around the sun, and I realized as I gazed upon so much empty, black space in the sky how deep it was, how lonely. That heliocentric universe, lit up by the light of our own hubris, was admittedly vast and mysterious; its unknown workings fascinated me. But even though it made me feel awe, it also left me feeling cold. There is no good light to see a loving Creator by in that sky; His hand vast, but it is also harder to see as it turns the universe around a hub that science still can’t locate.
In contrast, anyone who has spent time in wilderness knows how self-evident the geocentric universe is. Back in my lonely stargazing days in Laramie, the stars burned so thick in the air that I couldn’t slot a fingernail’s width between them. Without the light of town to block my view, the sky looked both solid and yet strangely alive with motion. The closeness of those stars offered a comfort that the other, neverending sky never could; as they moved restlessly around my inert frame, I could also see the Hand which pushed them around their imaginary axis—and I could also imagine, at least briefly, that such a Hand just might also hold me within its grasp. Back in those years of my greatest doubt, this was the sky I tried with such care to re-create on my dorm ceiling with tiny glow-in-the-dark stars, a string compass, and a star chart. Even though I hung out with intellectualist astronomy students and agnostics back then, I didn’t think I wanted a universe warmed to a few degrees Kelvin. It was that close, immediate sky that a transcendentalist friend of mine adored when he went camping for the first time in his life; as he dropped his empty flask to the earth, he drunkenly exclaimed, over and over again, “Oh my God, look at all the stars…”
I could, in my own way, understand his reaction. For someone who had never once had seen anything more than the Big Dipper on a city skyline, the pressing weight of the spheres against his mind now threatened to overwhelm him. I, however, had seen and known both of these sides to the universe, and spending too much time under the turning spheres after my conversion made me start to take Him for granted. I still needed to figure out how to make these two worlds fit together under the same night sky.
* * *
My grandmother, matriarch and axis of my family’s careful universe, passed away last year. My mother was especially grieved at her passing, but the one who suffered most, and the most silently, was my sister Sparrowhawk. She held a deep affection for my grandmother, being just as restless and free spirit as she was, and Sparrowhawk’s own failing and sometimes violent marriage gave her a sense of kinship to my grandmother which no one else shared. In the days before Grandma’s funeral, none of us understood the weight of the grief and rage Sparrowhawk kept inside until it flared out unpredictably against us all.
Her most frequent victim of that fulminate grief, however, was her eldest daughter. My niece Kestrel had just turned fourteen and, just like her mother had once done, she found herself straining at the jesses for reasons she couldn’t explain, desperate to break loose, go haggard. On the day before the funeral, my sister and Kestrel had a vicious spat over something pointless; Sparrowhawk’s hidden tinder met Kestrel’s flame, and within seconds a screaming match flared up in our tiny hotel room. I made the mistake of interfering, and predictably, I escaped with a scorched face and singed fingers to mock my foolishness.
Later that night, after tempers died down to embers and we all sat sulking in my grandfather’s kitchen, Kestrel looked up towards me. “Aunt J., can you help me with something?” She asked over her schoolbooks.
“Sure, what’s up?” I asked.
“Can you help me count stars to figure out how bright the sky is? I have to do a star magnitude study for my science class while I’m out of town,” she explained. She and I slipped outside to the backyard to the comforting veil of darkness which hid our losses.
Once outside, we stood for a while at the blank stillness as she tried to tally up the night sky. “Wow, I’m getting, like, sixty stars. That’s pretty good, isn’t it?” Kestrel asked. I tried hard not to smile.
“Kestrel, hasn’t your mom ever taken you stargazing out-of-town?” I asked, baffled. She shook her head, and I tried hard not to growl in disapproval at my sister’s apostasy. ‘That’s it, we’re headed out,” I grumbled, which made Kestrel smile. “Grab a coat.” We slipped out of the house, away from our family’s muted rage and silent grief, to visit the stars.
In a real sense, these stars which Kestrel and I drive beneath are my grandmother’s. I drive several miles west out of Lewistown to where the road turns toward the ghost town where my grandmother grew up, and I pull off the highway onto a suggestion of a dirt road, just a couple of bare lines cut through the wheatgrass. The darkness slams a lid over our car, pierced only by the dome light as Kestrel gets out of the passenger seat. We lean back against the trunk of the car; after a couple of minutes, her eyes adjust to the perfectly moonless night, and she gives a low whistle. “God, look at all the stars,” she whispers reverently. I smile inwardly.
We do a short catalog of the stars in the night sky, and after some scientific discussion, Kestrel decides that she can see up to magnitude seven stars in the sky.
“Not so fast,” I tell her. “Look to the east.” She peers over to where a dark pink smudge creeps up the edge of the sky.
“You can’t really see stars at that magnitude unless you get about forty miles away from town lights,” I tell her. “That light pollution is hiding a lot more than you realize.” The idea hits her like a revolution.
“So, there’s even more than this?” She gapes in awe.
“Yeah, Kestrel. There’s a lot more stars than even this.”
She sits silently in thought while I teach her the names of the constellations and their courses; I tell her about the ecliptic, the declination of the night sky, running through the same celestial catechism I had learned by heart but she was never offered. In the dark, I can almost feel her mind punching through the boundless limits of her new-found sky, escaping the confines of her youth and disappointment into the arms that turn the heavens.
A sudden realization stops her short. “This is what Great-Grandma saw every night on the farm, wasn’t it?” Kestrel asks me. As I lean against the trunk of my car, parked in a field on the rim of the Judith Basin, her question turns my mind over the axis of the heavens, back to my grandmother’s adolescence: before her own grand rebellion, before my grandfather and their disastrous marriage. I see her just as young, as wild and angry as I once was and my niece is now becoming, her thin, still form blocked in silhouette against the revolving sky; she sits on the back of her father’s tractor in a frozen landscape of hard winter wheat, watching the same sky that her great-granddaughter now ponders with an equal and restive fascination. In the edges of my niece’s blue eyes I see reflected her great-grandmother’s, restless with anger at the vast cage that her father’s acreage makes of her freedom. As she combs the endless skies with her eyelashes and plumbs the depths of the same shifting stars I now watch, suddenly she finds what I had lost so long ago and just so recently discovered:
“The music, in the stars. Jackrabbit, can you hear it?”
PHOTO CREDIT:
1) Night Sky (Wish you were here Andreas) by Indian.summer 1901's Flickr photostream:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27962415@N07/ / CC BY-NC 2.0
2) Night sky in Wyoming, taken by Gary Elasser:
2) Night sky in Wyoming, taken by Gary Elasser:
Labels:
creative writing,
family,
RBU
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)