Not to prevent you all from thinking for yourselves on this one, but I obviously think it's all pretty terrible; the reporting is awful, I'm not sure I trust their motives, and they're a little too willing to take McKinney and Henderson's story as truth (which has changed since the report, I might add). There are, however, a few important points brought up nonetheless. Shepard wasn't an angel; he was a kid battling his own personal demons, something his mother's been pretty open about. The police did focus on robbery as a motive for a little bit. And McKinney and Henderson really were that lousy of human beings. Those facts, however, don't change a damn thing about the reality of how or why those two men thought that bludgeoning an openly gay kid for his shoes was a good idea.
Oh, and I also found a very, very interesting academic article on the 20/20 program as well. If you have access to JSTOR you can download it:
Charles, Casey. "Panic in the Project: Critical Queer Studies and the Matthew Shepard Murder." Law and Literature 18.2 (2006): 225-252.
It's heavily over-theorized and a LOT of fun. Check it out!
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4490600
No comments:
Post a Comment